Warwick Bruce Chapman

The Addington Childrens Hospital has for long been a point of concern for many Durbanites. Not only does the crumbling landmark detract from the area as a whole, but given the need for hospital space and child focused health services in South Africa, it is tragic that it is not being used as intended.

Image: Chris Bloom

I was asked by a constituent to find out what was happening with the hospital so I approached Real Estate Department at eThekwini Municipality as a first step. This is the response:

The Hospital is located on Portions 22, 23 & 24 of Erf 10054 Durban which were sold and transferred by the erstwhile City Council, together with certain school sites, to the State under a single Deed of Transfer.

The MEC of Health, Dr Sibongiseni Dhlomo has previously announced that the Province has decided to reopen the Addington Children’s Hospital after appropriate renovations.

Since this seems now to be a project* being run by the provincial department of health, I will now follow this issue up with members of the provincial legislature and see what feedback I can get.

* Some interesting links relating to the project:
http://theridgeonline.co.za/r118m-for-addington/
http://www.kznhealth.gov.za/Addington/childhosp1.pdf

This speech was prepared for the eThekwini Council meeting on 27 September, 2011. The motion was passed by the full council with only the Minority Front abstaining.

Why I now favour speed humps for road safety

As ward councillors we receive many requests for speed humps to be installed by residents worried about their safety and the safety of their families.

One of the requests I submitted recently was for a section of Clark Rd and I explained that between Manning and Bulwer, there is a Childrens Home, Student Residence and two Churches. As many ward councillors will know, the typical response goes something like this:

“Current Council Policy precludes the installation of speed humps on higher order roads” and “the accident record on this road is insufficient to meet the policy requirements”.

On the one hand there is merit to not adjusting the engineering of a road unless there is evidence that there are problems with it, the accident record. Instead, we should be able to rely on regular speed enforcement on our roads as a deterrent.

On the other hand, we know and need to accept at least for now, that our Metro Police are incapable are enforcing speeds on our roads. As I showed last year, Metro Police only have 50% of the staff they need, and I have confirmed that they only have 1 speed timing device for the entire Metro. So, as many have asked, must we always wait until people die before we change the engineering?

I remind council of the protests which took place last year in KwaMashu K-Section because residents were fed up with their children being killed and injured on Nkonjane Road while council stood by and threw the rule book at them.

I used to be firmly of the opinion that we must only change the engineering of our roads where there is a known problem shown in accident statistics, despite the efforts of our Metro police to enforce the rules of the road. Of late, however, I have grown weary of trying to inspire improved performance out of the Metro Police.

If we are honest with one another, we will accept that Metro Police are extremely efficient at issuing parking tickets and staging road blocks. However, active enforcement activities like speed enforcement, interception of wreckless drivers and drivers jumping lights or stops has all but ceased.

I am thus now firmly of the opinion that we need to take practical engineering measures to improve the safety of our residential roads on more roads than we have before. This means both more money and a change in policy.

I understand that a policy review has already been called for, and it is thus against this backdrop that I have tabled this Notice of Motion asking our officials to review the World Health Organisation’s “World report on road traffic injury prevention” and consider the recommendations while undertaking our policy review. Further, acknowledging that we need more engineering interventions, I have asked that the budget for traffic calming measures be doubled for the next financial year.

Thus, considering what I have put before you, I humbly ask for your support in this matter which affects each and every one of us.

Cllr Warwick Chapman | 083 7797 094

Below, please find an extract of the minutes of the eThekwini Council meeting held on 5 September, 2011.

3. Question submitted by Councillor WB Chapman: Cable Theft (27/1/1/5/R):

3.1 What were the cable theft losses in eThekwini for the financial years 2007/2008, 2008/2009, 2009/2010, 2010/2011, 2011/2012 to date?

3.2 Has eThekwini established a specialised unit to combat cable theft?

3.2.1 If yes:-

3.2.1.1 How many permanent members are assigned to the unit; and

3.2.1.2 What budget has been assigned to the unit including the costs of posts permanently assigned t the unit; and

3.2.1.3 Who heads the unit; and

3.2.1.4 When was the unit established?

3.2.1.5 Is the unit focusing on scrap metal dealers across eThekwini?

3.2.1.5.1 If yes:-

3.2.1.5.1.1 How many scrap metal dealers in eThekwini were charged for buying stolen cables during 2010/2011?

3.2.1.5.2 If not, why not?

3.2.2 If not, why not?

3.3 Given that cable theft constitutes damage to public infrastructure necessary for the priority of service delivery in local governments, has eThekwini interacted with National Government with a view to reclassifying cable theft in a more serious crime category?

3.3.1 If yes, please provide a summary of our representation and the response from National Government.

3.3.2 If not, why not?

As Councillor DG Hoorzuk was providing responses, clarity was sought in terms of the relevant Chairperson not providing answers to questions. The Head: Legal Services advised that the Rules of Order stated that the Chairperson must ensure that responses were provided appropriately and that the Chairperson could request any Councillor to provide same. Thereafter, Councillor DG Hoorzuk provided the following respective responses:-

3.1 This is only direct cost, year 2007/2008 R15 608 850, Year 2008/2009 R16 675 844, year 2009/2010 R22 683 307, year 2010/2011 22 206 718, year 2011‑2012 only two months of data would not be measured against annually figures, there had been drastic increase of copper cables theft and electrical Infrastructure since 2007 to date. This was due to the fact that copper was valued at approximately R65. 00 per kg and the demand for exports to India and China were high.

3.2 Yes, a Business Risk Control Branch was started in 2009.

3.2.1.1 There were currently, six members of staff in the division made up as follows:-Three belong to the Risk Section and two investigators and a Senior Manager.

3.2.1.2 The Branch had been assigned a budget of R29 million.

3.2.1.3 The Senior Manager of the branch was Manju Naidoo. The Unions objected both at Local and Cluster Local Labour Forums to the Business Risk organogram being amended to include network theft and investigations section. It took a year and was only finalized in November 2010. The Senior Investigator post for the Network Section had been advertised four times to date and no suitable candidates had been recruited. At present, six Task Teams from the external security providers had been appointed, to patrol, monitor and react to reported incidents of cable theft until the Branch was adequately staffed.

3.2.1.4 2009

3.2.1.5 Scrap dealers

The Unit was focusing on scrap dealers together with Provincial South African Police Services, Non Ferrous Crime Combating Committee – Brigadier Harry and Business against Crime. This Committee under Brigadier Harry is committed to more raids on scrap dealers.

Raids were conducted on suspected dealer premises at least every 3 months with SAPS. The onus ultimately lies with SAPS and NPA in charging and prosecuting these dealers. The Municipality had no direct jurisdiction over these dealers. Council could only advise SAPS the suspected dealers in the industry, surveillance and raids are then conducted by SAPS – Organised Crime Unit.

It must also be noted that illegal “Bucket Shops” represent a major problem as they were unregulated, difficult to locate and contribute to significant quantities of copper and other metals leaving our shores.

Thus far, only a few scrap dealers have received fines from SAPS. There have been no convictions against them to date regarding eThekwini Electricity property.

The Municipality had been awaiting amendments and promulgation of the Second Hand Goods Act for the past two years. This new Act will give law enforcement “more teeth to prosecute dealers who were in possession of metals in their possession where they cannot identify the legitimate source of ownership. There would be stricter fines and sentences to be imposed on these scrap dealers.

Amendments to the legislation have been formulated collectively with Eskom, Telkom, Metrorail and Transnet via the National & Provincial Saps Non Ferrous Crime Combating Committee and Business Against Crime. The Minister of Energy has also recently publicised her support for these amendments. Research has shown that countries like Brazil have banned copper exports which have dramatically reduced copper theft. To get our country to adopt such a decision will require massive support from businesses as well as stakeholders in government.

Your views are extremely relevant at a time when the DA is embarking on a the final leg of our own long walk to government – winning substantial numbers of black votes. The question in the minds of many is, “Does the DA’s liberal position hurt us in that is does not endear us to conservative black or minority voters?”

Our history is marred with the discrimination which results from conservatives providing excuses such as protecting culture or familiy values to legitmise things like apartheid or homophobia.

Basically, the party’s position, and one I hold personally, is that the only way forward for us is a more liberal, tolerant and free society where the right to be who you want to be and do what you wish is balanced only by the responsibility to respect the rights of others.

I personally see no reason whatsoever why a gay family would contribute to the erosion of family or social values. What is far more important is that children get to grow up in a supportive and healthy environment.

I am far more concerned, for example, about the damage to our social fabric caused by the institutionalised consumption of alcohol than I could ever be about something as inane as gay marriages. Yet society hardly ever makes a peep about our culture of drinking and being dangerous or abusive while drunk.

The reality is that until our democracy matures, you need to put your cross where it *really* counts. Right now, the most important thing for you or I is that this country, and by reference the health of our democracy, survives the damage being caused to it by the ANC government.

What we have is a race between the decline in the state’s ability to deliver and the quality of its delivery – and the resultant impact it has on the social cohesion of the poor – and the rise of the DA to unseat the Government.

It is not guaranteed, perhaps unlikely, that a mass uprising of the poor would rally behind the DA. Instead we must ensure that a peaceful transition in Government takes place so we can reduce the size of government, improve efficiency, improve quality, reduce wastage and most crucially, drive economic growth.

Right now, given what is at stake, your choice is one of which large party do I support, the DA or the ANC. That choice then becomes simpler: How many DA reps do you know? Do they work hard? Do they represent their communities? Are they corrupt?

I know, without a shred of doubt, that despite the many problems we have of our own, our public representatives form the most effective, honest and hardworking group of politicians in South Africa. We deal with non-performance and we deal with anything resembling corruption swiftly.

My view is that the only party you have the option to support in securing the immediate future of our country is the DA. Thereafter, as it stabilises, specialist interest group parties can grow and estalish themselves as players.

Lastly, I do not love the DA. It is large, unwieldy, messy organisation filled with a great many frustrating people. It does however, work its butt off to be better every day. And I respect that, and it is thus worthy of my support.

What I do love, is South Africa. And I want to save South Africa. The best chance we have of that right now is the DA, so I’m giving it everything I’ve got.

The DA’s understanding of redress begins with recognising that poverty and inequality are the inescapable realities of life for the majority of SA citizens, and further that much of this reality is the consequence of our nation’s divided and discriminatory history. Statutory measures designed to discriminate against people of colour and to advantage a racial minority were part of not only the legacy of apartheid but of our colonial history too. The DA’s commitment to the open, opportunity society for all means that we cannot pretend that this history didn’t happen, nor can we just assume that our 1996 Constitution which enshrines equality will produce a more fair and just society without systematic policy interventions on our part.

Redress means a number of things for the DA. This paper sets out some of the key components of our position but is, of necessity, not all that could be said.

1. We recognise that achieving human dignity and human rights for all are issues for which all DA public representatives must be seen to be passionately committed. Actions or statements by organisations or individuals which abuse or devalue the worth of any of our fellow South Africans must be condemned without reservation. The DA must be seen to be at the forefront of any campaign which defends our Constitutional rights.

2. Practical measure to achieve redress include various forms of structural intervention to level the economic playing fields between rich and poor. This means supporting budget allocations in the areas which can eliminate the inter-generational transmission of poverty and inequality – especially in education, health, transport and housing. This means supporting dedicated funding and programmes which by transform the quality of people’s lives and which give them enhanced opportunities to achieve their own and their children’s potential. The delivery of quality and accessible public health care and schooling must be imperatives for the DA wherever we are in government.

3. The DA is opposed to the further racialising of society but we are supportive of creating economic opportunities for all those who are currently disadvantaged in terms of their employment skills or access to business contracts. Structural measures which rely simply on racial categories are crude and destroy national reconciliation and cohesion and the DA will look for other means of creating opportunities for all than the currently favoured BEE legislation. We need to support the efforts of local entrepreneurs, for small businesses and for companies which reflect SA’s diversity without resorting to racial bean counting or quotas. In terms of preferential procurement we need to create space for small emergent companies to compete and win market share against larger more established entities provided that the quality and efficiency of service delivery are not compromised.

4. Being committed to redress also means tackling the symbolic and very visible ways our society used to reflect the relative advantage of the few over the many. Whether in the naming of public places or institutions, or the celebration of national events and festivals, we need to seek the most inclusive solutions wherever possible. Names and places must reflect our truly rainbow heritage and become a celebration of our diversity not the cause of further division and racial enmity.

5. Ensuring food security for our people means protecting commercial agricultural production, but the DA supports creating opportunities for people from all communities to achieve access to farming skills and land. Opening up land ownership to all our citizens must go hand in hand with measures which will promote individual land ownership, enhanced agricultural productivity and ensuring that small-scale farmers have access to larger markets.

Mark Steele MPL is a DA member of the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Legislature and was previously an MP in the National Assembly.